Voting Rights
Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP
What's at stake
Learn about Voting Rights
Learn about Voting Rights
Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP
Voting Rights
Status: Ongoing
South Carolina unlawfully assigned voters to congressional districts based on their race and intentionally discriminated against Black voters in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
What's at stake
Learn about Voting Rights
Learn about Voting Rights
Stay informed about our latest work in the courts
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU's privacy policy.
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2021
New York Immigration Coalition v. Trump
The American Civil Liberties Union, New York Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Texas, and Arnold & Porter filed a federal lawsuit July 24, 2020, on behalf of immigrants’ rights groups challenging President Trump’s order seeking to block people who are undocumented from being counted in the U.S. census.
Status: Ongoing
View case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018
Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute
The American Civil Liberties Union and partner organizations filed a lawsuit challenging Ohio’s practice of ‘purging’ or removing people who vote infrequently from its voting rolls, charging that it is in violation of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
Status: Closed (Judgment)
View case
Jun 2016
Eason v. New York State Board of Elections
The American Civil Liberties Union and Disability Rights Advocates sued the New York State Board of Elections and Department of Motor Vehicles over online voter registration that is inaccessible to people with disabilities.
Status: Closed (Settled)
View case
North Carolina
May 2016
League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. v. North Carolina
The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of North Carolina Legal Foundation, and the Southern Coalition for Social Justice filed a lawsuit challenging North Carolina’s voter suppression law the very day it was signed by Gov. Pat McCrory in August 2013. The suit targets provisions of the law that eliminate a week of early voting, end same-day registration, and prohibit “out-of-precinct” voting. It seeks to stop North Carolina from applying these provisions, arguing that they unduly burden the right to vote and discriminate against African-American voters, in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s equal protection clause and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Status: Closed (Judgment)
View case
All Cases
87 Voting Rights Cases
Arkansas
Dec 2023
NAACP v. Arkansas Board of Apportionment
This case has two key parts: First, the Arkansas House district map diminishes the voting power of Black voters. Second, both the district court and Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals radically concluded that voters may not sue to protect their voting rights under Section 2, putting the VRA in further jeopardy and contradicting decades of precedent in which impacted voters — particularly Black voters — have challenged racially discriminatory voting laws.
Status: Ongoing
View case
Arkansas
Voting Rights
NAACP v. Arkansas Board of Apportionment
This case has two key parts: First, the Arkansas House district map diminishes the voting power of Black voters. Second, both the district court and Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals radically concluded that voters may not sue to protect their voting rights under Section 2, putting the VRA in further jeopardy and contradicting decades of precedent in which impacted voters — particularly Black voters — have challenged racially discriminatory voting laws.
Dec 2023
Status: Ongoing
View case
Kentucky Supreme Court
Nov 2023
Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Graham
State legislatures are responsible for creating state legislative and U.S. congressional districts. In 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Rucho v. Common Cause that federal courts have no authority to review claims that states have sorted voters along partisan lines to favor one political party over others. However, challenges to partisan gerrymandering continue in many state courts, and this case involves one such constitutional challenge in Kentucky. Attorneys from the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, along with the ACLU of Kentucky, filed an amicus brief in the Kentucky Supreme Court on behalf of the National ACLU, the ACLU of Kentucky, Black Lives Matter Louisville, and the Kentucky Equal Justice Center. The brief urges the state high court to strike down the redistricting maps because they violate Kentuckians’ state constitutional rights.
Status: Ongoing
View case
Kentucky Supreme Court
Voting Rights
Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Graham
State legislatures are responsible for creating state legislative and U.S. congressional districts. In 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Rucho v. Common Cause that federal courts have no authority to review claims that states have sorted voters along partisan lines to favor one political party over others. However, challenges to partisan gerrymandering continue in many state courts, and this case involves one such constitutional challenge in Kentucky. Attorneys from the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project and State Supreme Court Initiative, along with the ACLU of Kentucky, filed an amicus brief in the Kentucky Supreme Court on behalf of the National ACLU, the ACLU of Kentucky, Black Lives Matter Louisville, and the Kentucky Equal Justice Center. The brief urges the state high court to strike down the redistricting maps because they violate Kentuckians’ state constitutional rights.
Nov 2023
Status: Ongoing
View case
Utah Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Utah State Legislature v. League of Women Voters
This case involves a state constitutional challenge to the Utah Legislature’s 2021 redistricting plan, which was drawn to entrench the majority political party’s power and to discriminate against Utahns whose political expression aligns with an opposition political party. The ACLU and the ACLU of Utah filed an amicus brief in support of the challenge in the Utah Supreme Court, explaining why the redistricting map violates Utahns’ free-expression rights and why courts have the authority to block the map as unconstitutional.
Status: Ongoing
View case
Utah Supreme Court
Voting Rights
Utah State Legislature v. League of Women Voters
This case involves a state constitutional challenge to the Utah Legislature’s 2021 redistricting plan, which was drawn to entrench the majority political party’s power and to discriminate against Utahns whose political expression aligns with an opposition political party. The ACLU and the ACLU of Utah filed an amicus brief in support of the challenge in the Utah Supreme Court, explaining why the redistricting map violates Utahns’ free-expression rights and why courts have the authority to block the map as unconstitutional.
Jun 2023
Status: Ongoing
View case